Vivobase Mobile and Car Editions: Assessing Protective Effects Against EMF
The research team conducted a follow-up study to evaluate the protective efficacy of Vivobase Move (previously Mobile and Car editions) against EMF, using a similar experimental framework as the Vivobase Home study. The goal was to measure the devices’ ability to mitigate EMF effects from mobile phones.
Experimental Design
The study adhered to clinical research principles:
● Prospective: Hypotheses were based on prior data.
● Placebo-Controlled: Participants were unaware of device states.
● Double-Blind: Assistants were also unaware of device states.
● Randomized: Scenarios were presented in random order.
Three scenarios were designed with distinct setups to assess the protective effects of Vivobase Mobile and Car editions:
Scenario 1 (Vivobase Mobile):
Vivobase Mobile and mobile phone both on. Participants were exposed to environmental and mobile phone EMF, protected by Vivobase Mobile placed in their right pants pocket.
Scenario 2 (Vivobase Car):
Vivobase Car and mobile phone both on. Participants were exposed to environmental and mobile phone EMF, protected by Vivobase Car placed 30 cm away.
Scenario 3 (Control):
Vivobase replaced with a dummy model; mobile phone on. Participants were exposed to environmental and mobile phone EMF without Vivobase protection.
Setup Details:
Mobile Phone Configuration:
Only GSM (3G/4G/5G data) enabled; Wi-Fi and Bluetooth disabled.
Set to silent mode with minimum screen brightness to conceal operation status.
Placed near participants’ head and shoulder.
Vivobase Placement:
Vivobase Mobile: In right pants pocket.
Vivobase Car: 30 cm from participants.
Monitoring: Participants were connected to a device measuring heart rate, muscle tone, skin conductance, respiratory rate, and finger temperature.
Study Protocol:
Participants: 30 individuals (ages 19–74), randomly selected.
Duration: July 18 to August 4, 2022.
Procedure: Participants sat for 45 minutes, with measurements taken over three phases:
Phase 1 (0–20 min): Baseline exposure.
Phase 2 (21–25 min): Increased EMF via continuous 5-minute calls to the mobile phone.
Phase 3 (26–45 min): Post-call exposure.
Controls:
No meals 1 hour prior; no coffee, alcohol, or energy drinks 3 hours prior.
Measurements taken on three different days at the same time to minimize external influences (e.g., fatigue).
Data Collection: Physiological parameters were recorded on three separate days to ensure consistency.
Key Findings
Underlined data indicate statistically significant differences, with larger values reflecting greater differences pre- and post-Vivobase activation.
Superior Protection Across Devices:
Both Vivobase Mobile and Car editions demonstrated significant protective effects compared to the control scenario, with statistically significant differences in physiological parameters (heart rate, muscle tone, skin conductance, respiratory rate, and finger temperature).
Comparative Efficacy:
Vivobase Mobile and Car editions showed similar protective capabilities, attributed to their shared core technology. However, Vivobase Mobile, placed closer to the body (in the pocket), provided slightly higher protection than Vivobase Car (30 cm away).
Statistical Significance:
Data from scenarios with Vivobase activated (Mobile and Car) showed highly significant differences, particularly in heart rate, muscle tone, and skin conductance. This supports the hypothesis that Vivobase effectively shields the body from mobile phone EMF, altering environmental conditions to reduce physiological stress.
Conclusion
The experiments validate the protective efficacy of Vivobase Mobile and Car editions against mobile phone EMF, mirroring the success of Vivobase Home. For urban residents exposed to Wi-Fi, 5G, and other EMF sources, Vivobase devices offer a reliable solution to safeguard health by mitigating electromagnetic stress.
